Dynamic Strategy

Strategy Execution by Design Series

Lever 2: Strategic Clarity & Alignment
Element 5: Dynamic Strategy

When was the last time your organisation remained committed to its strategic priorities, even when the world around you had clearly shifted?

Too often, strategy is treated as done deals. Yet markets shift, customer expectations evolve, and technologies disrupt faster than most organisations can respond.

Faced with change, many overcorrect by expanding the "strategic priorities" until everything becomes critical, which means that nothing truly is. But strategy is about choices, and that requires the discipline to pause, review, and re-align when value isn't emerging.

Dynamic strategic planning treats feedback as fuel, not failure. It builds in flexibility so organisations can course-correct before energy and investment drift in the wrong direction.

In my research, executives expressed frustration that despite a changing world, their strategies remained static. Teams continued to deliver against outdated priorities because the system wasn't designed to adapt. As one leader said, "We knew things had changed, but the plan didn't."

Organisations with the highest execution success treated strategy as learning in motion, constantly testing assumptions and adjusting direction.

A clear and compelling strategy doesn't hold its course no matter what. It listens for signals, learns, and adjusts.

McKinsey's research supports this: the most adaptive organisations revisit priorities four to six times more often than peers, reallocating resources dynamically.

Strategic execution needs rhythm, regular systems for reflection, not just reporting. Teams need structured moments to pause, test assumptions, and reset direction. When built into strategic reviews and governance, this discipline sharpens focus and builds trust.

The surge in agile ways of working has offered a practical structure for continuous reprioritisation. As one executive told me, "Agile enables quarterly re-prioritisation; we're getting much clearer on priorities and where we spend money."

But agile isn't the goal; this way of working supports the principle that execution thrives when strategy, priorities, and learning evolve together.

So, what can organisations do differently? 
- Create shorter planning cycles: Move from annual to rolling or quarterly planning, underpinned by the longer term vision.
- Ruthlessly define what matters most: Focus on the few priorities that create advantage and pause work that no longer drives value
- Use dynamic resource allocation: Shift funding and people toward the highest-value work as conditions change
- Act on evidence: Use data and stakeholder insight to guide shifts
- Reward adaptation, not rigidity: Normalise course correction as maturity, not failure.

Clarity sets direction. Iteration sustains it. That's why Strategic Clarity & Alignment is Lever 2 in my Execution by Design model.

Engage with this post on LinkedIn: 
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rebecca-reti-4582433b_executionbydesign-strategyexecution-dynamicstrategy-activity-7384453045486661632-s7s0?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAhmYsQBKppHDyfPTxqHXXgP5MmXRjB7WJs